We stand behind the work we do — including when it’s time to publish.

Our standard project reports are designed to support manuscript writing, and we routinely assist researchers during peer review and revision.

For every project we complete, we deliver a detailed report that includes a structured Methods section and a Results section. When appropriate — especially for exploratory or hypothesis-driven studies — we also include a Discussion section with key takeaways and limitations.

These reports are often sufficient for researchers to draft a manuscript. In many cases, they use our language directly or with light editing to form the foundation of their methods and results sections.

While we generally do not participate in manuscript writing directly, there are exceptions. If a researcher asks us to serve as co-authors, and we believe our contribution rises to that level, we may accept — especially when it involves intellectually complex analyses that require our direct input to interpret or describe properly.

In all cases, our priority is to support your success — whether or not we're listed as authors. That’s why we always help address reviewer questions related to the work we’ve done, including re-analysis or alternate pipelines, provided it falls within the original project scope.

We do this at no additional charge, and many clients have told us it was one of the most reassuring parts of working with us.

You can read about our quality standards on this page, or explore how our cost-effective model makes publication success more achievable here.

✅ How we support manuscript success:

- Delivering manuscript-ready reports with structured sections
- Helping interpret results or prepare figure captions
- Responding to reviewer questions about the analysis
- Offering reanalysis (within scope) if reviewers request it